La chronique économique de François Lambert | «Nous sommes arriérés!» - François Lambert
François Lambert critique le gouvernement pour la réduction du nombre de lieux de consignation prévus pour le 1 mars.
www.fm1077.caHere’s the latest I can confirm based on the most recent reporting up to now:
- François Lambert has publicly criticized Québec solidaire (QS) in several items around May 9–11, 2026, focusing on QS’s tax proposals for the ultra-rich and on what he characterizes as an anti-entrepreneur stance. These remarks circulated widely on social media and in interviews, generating notable controversy and media attention.[1][2][3][4]
- The controversy centers on QS’s proposals to tax high fortunes (including talks of 1% or higher rates on very large wealth) and on broader debates about economic policy, inflation drivers, and state subsidy structures. Lambert argues for a pro-entrepreneurship position and harsher critique of new taxes, while QS emphasizes income inequality and targeted taxation as part of their platform.[4][1]
- Coverage includes both written pieces and broadcasts/long-form discussions where Lambert is quoted sharply, describing QS as disconnected from business realities and framing entrepreneurship as the engine of growth. The conversation has extended to public radio/TV segments and clips, amplifying the dispute.[3][8][4]
Quick context:
- Québec solidaire is a left-wing party in Quebec advocating for more progressive taxation and social programs, and they have proposed measures aimed at higher-income households and corporations in various policy discussions.[10]
- François Lambert is a well-known entrepreneur who frequently comments on economic policy and has publicized critiques of QS’s platform during this period.[1][3]
Illustration (how the dispute unfolded):
- A major flashpoint was QS’s proposal to tax fortunes above certain thresholds, prompting Lambert to publish a strong rebuttal and urge a shift away from increased taxation toward market-driven solutions. Media segments and online clips captured Lambert’s statements, heightening the debate among supporters of both sides.[4][1]
Would you like a concise timeline of the key statements and the main arguments from both sides, or a digest with direct quotes and the latest linked articles? I can also pull the most recent developments from QS or Lambert’s outlets if you want. Please note this summary reflects reporting up to early May 2026. For precise quotes, I can provide exact snippets after you confirm the format you prefer.[2][3][1][4]